The Government Should Not Suspend Civil Right For National...

Throughout Canadian history, the issue of whether or not the government has the right to suspend civil right for national security has been debated by many citizens. Some people believed that the government is justified to hold off basic individual liberties is reasonable for the safety and protection of all Canadians. However, other believed that the government should not suspend civil rights for the sake of national security. Through careful analysis of the Japanese-Canadian Interments, the FLQ crisis and the Ukrainian-Canadian internment, it can be shown that the government showed unlawfulness in suspending individual rights and liberties. Some people has argued that the government justified its action for the protection of Canadians. During times of war, Canadians have feared for their safety and therefore, decreases their quality of life. For instance, news about the bombing and Pearl Harbour has spread throughout Canada, and the likeliness of Japan’s attack on Canada had increased. The government could not take risk, therefore they took aside the rights of a group of persons for the protection of all Canadians. This was not only acceptable, but also necessary for Canada to survive. Also, the FLQ fighters murdered an innocent government official and posed a threat to many citizens in Quebec. In addition to this, it is stated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms only apply to reasonable limits. Lastly, Ukrainian Canadian were considered enemy aliens, a hugeShow MoreRelatedHabeas Corpus Essay1566 Words   |  7 PagesHABEAS CORPUS TERESA WATSON AMERICAN NATIONAL HISTORY PROFESSOR BRENT SCHINDLER FEBUARY 4, 2013 Habeas Corpus in its most familiar form has played an important role in â€Å"Anglo American history as a safe guard of individual liberty. It is defined as being a writ directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time and a specified place for a specified purpose. In contemporary practice, the writRead MoreThe Rights Of Habeas Corpus956 Words   |  4 Pagesthe writ of habeas corpus amid intense political instability was necessary. In order to give legal advice with substance to Her Excellency President Dove, the counsel remained very objective and impartial on her actions within the period of time the civil war lasted. The counsel is reviewing Madame Dove’s actions on three folds, 1, is her action to wage war constitutional? 2, is her action violate the constitution check and balances of powers? 3 is her action completely unconstitutional? These are theRead MoreThe Aria of War: Justifications for the Pursuit of National Security at Any Price1434 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction The end of the Cold War and attacks of 9/11 dramatically altered the landscape of United States national security endeavors. Gone was the singular, nearly tactile threat as presented by a major superpower, and in its place was the â€Å"amorphous nature of a terrorist opponent,† (Snow, 2014, p. 112). This novel threat defied easy definition or identification, and attacked in ways to which the U.S. had grown unaccustomed. Phrases like â€Å"asymmetrical warfare† and â€Å"war on terror† were usedRead MoreHabeas Corpus and the War on Terror Essay1307 Words   |  6 Pageshistory of habeas corpus and how it came to be. This is an act that originated back in 1863 to suspend the right to trial if you are found guilty of treason or terrorist actions against the United States and it is enacted by the president when the necessity arises (Habeas Corpus Act of 1863. (2009). Given that this is a mandate from the president himself courts as well as judges who have issued a writ must suspend it until the president has resumed the use of habeas corpus. The habeas Corpus is a traditionRead MoreReweneable Essay1236 Words   |  5 Pagesbeing sent to jail. By asking for the right of Habeas corpus, this would allow the prisoner to defend their actions or produce the evidence being brought forth is false to keep from in just imprisonment. Recently our nation has been accused of un justice and putting imprisoners and sending them to Cuba, Not giving the proper judgment to the person being accused. In this paper I will talk about the role play of the constitution, the impact in society, Civil Rights, and Habeas Corpus History. HabeasRead MoreThe Privacy Of An Individual1700 Words   |  7 Pagesand democratic form of government, declaring that, â€Å"it is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong.† The privacy of an individual is at its most a fundamental right to which one is entitled. Furthermore, the infringement of an individual’s privacy is rarely justified to any extent, even under circumstances with the purpose of protecting a nation because it deprives individuals of their fundamental rights. However, the government believes that they haveRead MoreShould Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War1571 Words   |  7 PagesDuring Americas most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictio ns are often placed on some of the most basic freedoms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraintRead MoreCivil Liberties During World War II1665 Words   |  7 Pagesresolve to rectify injustice and to uphold the rights of individuals. We can never fully right the wrongs of the past. But we can take a clear stand for justice and recognize that serious injustices were done to Japanese Americans during World War II. --President George H.W. Bush, 1988 Many times in history the Supreme Court has been faced with deciding how to treat civil liberties during war time. This raises the question, what restrictions if any should the court allow during wartime. The court isRead MoreHabeas Corpus Essay912 Words   |  4 Pagescountry are to keep National Security and Public Safety. But in the time war or an act of aggression on United State soil, Presidents have to use his commander and chief obligations without a lot diplomatic procedures. The objective of this essay is to give three of the most historical suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 handed down from England, and to give what action were taken and how the writ of Habeas Corpus was re-instated by congress. On the final explanation, how right of Habeas CorpusRead MoreThe Reign of Bush-Obama and their Power Essay1386 Words   |  6 Pages Many argue that the most powerful branch in government is the Executive Branch. The President is considered as the most influential and the most important position in the U.S. government. However, the powers granted to Presidents and the prerogative they have exerted are not listed in the Constitution but instead have been adapted and expanded upon by each President. Although the Constitution does not define the powers of the President, it has defined Presidential powers in terms of peace, war,